TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Sid Bala’s 2016 article, “H.264 Is Magic,” explains how the video codec makes moving images far smaller by discarding some visual detail and encoding repeated information efficiently. The supplied source excerpt describes the principles and examples, but does not establish a new technical release or current development.
Sid Bala’s 2016 article “H.264 Is Magic” explains why the widely used video codec can store moving images in a fraction of the space required for uncompressed video: it removes some visual detail and represents repeated information more compactly. The post is a technical explainer, not an announcement of a new H.264 version or a change to the standard; its relevance is in showing the principles behind a format used across internet video, Blu-ray discs, phones and cameras.
Bala opens with the data burden of raw video. Using a 1920-by-1080 image at 60 frames per second and three bytes per pixel for red, green and blue, he calculates a rate of about 370 megabytes per second. That is an illustrative uncompressed-data estimate based on those stated assumptions, not a measurement of a particular video or device. It shows why storing and transmitting every pixel in every frame without compression is impractical for many uses.
To illustrate the difference, the article compares a PNG screenshot of an Apple homepage, listed at 1,015 kilobytes, with a five-second, 60-frame-per-second H.264 video of the same page, listed at 175 kilobytes. Bala says the video contains 300 frames. These are examples from his post, not a controlled benchmark: the excerpt does not specify encoding settings, image quality, or the exact method used to create the files. The comparison should not be treated as a general compression ratio for H.264.
The article explains that H.264 is lossy: it can discard image detail that viewers may be less likely to notice. By contrast, PNG is lossless, meaning the original image data can be recovered from the encoded file. Bala also introduces information entropy, describing how repeated or predictable data can be represented in fewer bits, and begins explaining frequency-domain transforms. The supplied excerpt ends during that discussion, so it does not contain the article’s full treatment of the codec’s methods.
Why Smaller Video Files Matter
Compression changes what video can be stored, transmitted and played on everyday equipment. If every frame required the raw data rate in Bala’s example, moving high-resolution video across a network or saving it to a disc would demand far more capacity and bandwidth. H.264’s combination of detail reduction and more efficient representation makes practical video distribution possible at much lower data rates, with some loss of information.
The trade-off matters to anyone encoding or watching video. A smaller file does not preserve every pixel exactly, as a lossless image format would; the result depends on the compression choices and how much detail is discarded. Bala’s examples help explain the mechanism, but they do not establish how a given H.264 file will look or how small it will be. That depends on the source footage and encoding parameters, which are not specified in the supplied excerpt.
Products Worth Considering
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Wireless Noise-Cancelling Headphones with Spatial Audio, Black
Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (12th Generation, 2024), 16 GB, 7-inch Display, Jade
Logitech MX Brio Ultra HD 4K Webcam, Graphite
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Raw Frames to H.264
Bala frames H.264 as the product of decades of work to reduce the bandwidth needed for full-motion video. He describes it as a standard used across consumer and networked devices, including phones, Blu-ray and security cameras. The source presents this as background to the explanation; it does not give a detailed standards history, adoption timeline, or comparison with other codecs.
The explainer’s central contrast is between a stream of complete pixel arrays and a compressed representation that takes advantage of what can be discarded or encoded more efficiently. Its car-weight analogy introduces lossy compression: remove what contributes less to the result rather than preserve every component. Bala then distinguishes that process from lossless encoding, which changes how information is represented without removing the original information. These are general compression concepts, not techniques unique to H.264.
“H.264 is a video compression codec standard.”
— Sid Bala, in “H.264 Is Magic” (2016)
Limits of the Published Examples
The supplied source excerpt is incomplete: it stops as Bala begins discussing frequency-domain representation. It therefore does not show the rest of his explanation or establish which specific encoding tools he covers later in the article. The excerpt also provides no publication date beyond the year 2016.
The file-size examples lack details needed for independent comparison, including the H.264 encoder, bitrate, quality settings and PNG creation process. The stated 370 MB-per-second figure is based on the article’s specified pixel dimensions, frame rate and three-byte pixel assumption; it is not a universal rate for all raw video. No new codec release, standards decision, adoption statistic or present-day performance claim is reported in the supplied material.
No New Standard Change Reported
The source material describes an explanatory article and identifies no follow-up announcement, planned standards action or upcoming milestone. The next step for readers seeking the full account is to consult Bala’s original post, which may include the remainder of the discussion beyond the excerpt provided here.
For practical comparisons, file sizes should be assessed using clearly stated source footage, resolution, frame rate, encoder settings and quality targets. Without those details, Bala’s numbers work as illustrations of the compression challenge, not as a prediction of how H.264 will perform on another video.
Key Questions
What is the news development in “H.264 Is Magic”?
The supplied material is about Sid Bala’s 2016 explainer on video compression. It does not report a new H.264 release, standards change or technology announcement.
Why does raw 1080p video require so much data in Bala’s example?
Bala estimates about 370 megabytes per second for 1920-by-1080 video at 60 frames per second, assuming three bytes per pixel. That calculation represents uncompressed RGB data under those assumptions.
How does H.264 reduce video file size?
The excerpt says H.264 uses lossy compression, discarding some image detail, and introduces more compact ways of representing information. The supplied text does not include the full technical explanation.
Does the 175-kilobyte example prove H.264 is always smaller than PNG?
No. It is one comparison in Bala’s article between a particular PNG screenshot and a five-second H.264 video. The source excerpt does not state the encoding settings or quality conditions needed to generalize the result.
Source: sidbala.com
